Carter v. City of Carlsbad
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
IRMA E. GONZALEZ, Chief Judge.
Presently before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. [Doe. No. 41.] For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants’ motion.
BACKGROUND
On Saturday, October 31, 2009, Plaintiff William Cody Carter (“Carter” or “Plaintiff’); his fíaneée, Megan Damico (“Megan”); Megan’s sister, Jalyn Damico (“Jalyn”); Virginia Muía, and Judah Stauffer planned to spend the evening at the Coyote Bar & Grill in Carlsbad (the “Coyote”). Before going…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Clark v. WareDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2012
- Nash-Perry v. City of BakersfieldDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021