Legal Opinion

Goldsmith v. Parsons

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 23, 1934No. 14674PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WESTERFIELD, Judge.

This is a suit on a promissory note in the principal sum of $1,757.75, with interest and attorney’s fees, subject to a credit of $160. Defendant admitted the signature to the note, but avers that at the time of the making of the note there was a verbal agreement between himself and the payee that a lesser amount would be accepted in payment upon the happening of certain conditions, which had been realized.

There was judgment below, as prayed for, and defendant has appealed.

The plaintiff acquired the note sued on after maturity by inheritance from her deceased husbánd, Jacob…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Griffin & Dyson v. Cowan, Dykers & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1860
  2. Saramia v. CourrégéSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1858
  3. People's Bank v. CookstonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Bowen v. Waxelbaum & BrotherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  5. Pegram v. CooperSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1874

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Goldsmith v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  2. Phillips v. Gillaspie.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Goldsmith v. ParsonsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API