Sun Oil Co. v. Fisher
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
Again the task is to sort out a legislative purpose in conflicting statutes on the taxation and valuation of subsurface oil, gas, and mineral interests. The Supreme Court held earlier in this case1 that Section 193.-481(1)2 subjects “separated” oil, gas, and *414mineral interests — those carved out of the fee — to county ad valorem real property taxation. Now: notwithstanding that Section 211.133 forbids any increased assessment of land because “there may be oil or gas under the surface” and declares that appraisal of oil and gas in place is “impossible under known valuation…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Williams v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
- Small v. Sun Oil CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1969
- Archer v. MarshallSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- Cassady v. Consolidated Naval Stores CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1960
- Escambia Chemical Corporation v. FisherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- DEPT. OF LEGAL AFF. v. Sanford-Orlando Kennel Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1983