Legal Opinion

Griffin v. Rice

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 2012No. 2011-SC-000250-DGPublished

1Dissent · CunninghamCunningham, J.

This case presents one simple issue. Who gets the workers’ compensation money from the estate of the dead Curtis Rice — the loving, nurturing mother of the deceased or the adulterous and absent wife?

The majority opinion today projects this Court into the sordid business of deciding how many times a person must have sex outside of marriage before deemed to be “living in adultery.” In doing so, we place more emphasis on the sex than the marriage. We are also losing sight of the real purpose of the statute. This Court should not have to continually review the sex lives of married couples in…

Also in this document: Dissent · Noble.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sexton v. SextonKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Goss v. FromanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1889
  3. J.N.R. v. O'ReillyKentucky Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Liberty Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. KummertCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
  5. Baker v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API