Legal Opinion
Schmitz v. Binette
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided October 13, 2006No. 1-05-2710PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Joseph Gordon
Plaintiffs, Mary Ellen Schmitz and Ambrose Joseph Schmitz, brought suit against defendants, Steven Binette, M.D., Dr. Paul K. Rosenberg, Ltd., and Daniel Garvey, M.D., alleging damages for negligence stemming from a “bladder suspension procedure” performed by Dr. Binette on Mary. Ambrose also brought claims for “family expenses” pursuant to the Rights of Married Persons Act (750 ILCS 65/15 (West 2002)) and for loss of consortium. Mary died prior to trial and Ambrose was appointed special administrator of Mary’s estate. Plaintiff dismissed the claims against defendants Dr. Paul K. Rosenberg,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Walski v. TiesengaIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Borowski v. Von SolbrigIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
- Mielke v. Condell Memorial HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Stevenson v. NautonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Bafia v. City International Trucks, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Bergman v. KelseyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- Maggi v. RAS Development, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- Alm v. Loyola University Medical CenterAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- Taylor v. County of CookAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- Jacobs v. Yellow Cab Affiliation, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2017
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.