Legal Opinion
Henrik Mannerfrid v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided October 18, 1956No. 13242PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Mannerfrid instituted in the District Court a civil action for declaratory judgment 1 and for injunctive and other relief. He alleged that the defendant Attorney General of the United States was about to deport him. In brief the facts developed in the complaint and answer were that Mannerfrid entered the United States in 1941 and obtained successive extensions of time to remain here until he was admitted as a permanent resident in April, 1949. Thereafter on approximately thirteen occasions he received reentry permits and reentered the United States under…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mannerfrid v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Mannerfrid v. BrownellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1956
- In re MannerfridDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1951
3Cited by7 opinions
- Victoria Marquez Talavera v. Thomas M. Pederson, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- Ahmet Haci Memishoglu v. Walter H. Sahli, District Director of Immigration and NaturalizationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
- KHANBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1973
- Wong Kwok Sui v. John P. Boyd, as District Director of Immigration and Naturalization Service at Seattle, WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Giz v. BrownellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.