Legal Opinion

Stacey v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 17, 1936No. 30,621PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hilton, Justice.

Appeal from an order of the district court denying defendants’ motion for a new trial in an action to recover upon a contract for the sale and conveyance to defendants of certain real estate located in the city of Minneapolis.

Russell L. Hawes, a resident of Worcester, Massachusetts, died in 1867, possessed, among other property, of a certain tract of real estate situate in what is now the city of Minneapolis. In ancillary proceedings his will was administered in probate court in Hennepin county. The decree of distribution decreed the property to “Stowe F. Hawes and Manson D.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Webster v. MorrisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Townshend v. GoodfellowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  3. Congdon v. CongdonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. George v. ConhaimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  5. Atwater v. RussellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bush v. CrowtherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  2. In Re Declaration of Trust by BushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  3. Miller v. SnedekerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. Kirsch v. KahnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API