Legal Opinion · Dissent

Amax Nickel Refining Co. v. United Steelworkers, Local No. 8373

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 13, 1988No. 88-CA-0405Published

1DissentCiaccio, Judge

I agree with the majority opinion until it impliedly decides that this matter is controlled by contract law. This matter involves a labor dispute, La.R.S. 23:821, and is controlled by those statutes governing injunctions in labor dispute, La.R.S. 23:841 —23:849. Relying on those statutes as statements of public policy and legislative intent, and as the controlling law, I would reverse the district court judgment and dissolve the now stale and outmoded injunction.

Going beyond general due process requirements, La.R.S. 23:843, a statutory declaration of public policy, recognizes that injunctive…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baton Rouge Etc. v. Gen. Truck, Etc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  2. Tenneco, Inc. v. Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Union, Local 4-522Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Coastal Cargo Co. v. General Longshore Workers Local Union No. 3000 International Longshoremen's Ass'nLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API