Legal Opinion

Sonnier v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided January 11, 1989No. 09-88-113-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURGESS, Justice.

This is an appeal from a conviction for aggravated robbery. Appellant brings five points of error.

Point of error one alleges the trial court permitted two amendments to appellant’s indictment in violation of TEX. CODE CRIM.PROC.ANN art. 28.10(a) & (c) (Vernon Supp.1988). The indictment, which originally alleged appellant committed a robbery “on or about the 14th day of March, 1986,” was amended to allege commission “on or about the 14th day of March, 1987.” Also, the indictment was amended to allege theft of property owned by Bruce Poland rather than by Betty Hol-berg…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McClenan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  2. Brem v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Waller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Foreman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Dixon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Flowers v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1990
  2. Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Ward v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API