Legal Opinion

Coogan Finance Corp. v. Beatcher

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 28, 1932No. Docket No. 7031PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON (IRA F.), J.

The plaintiff brought action against defendant to recover the sum of $3,300, interest and attorney’s fees. The complaint contained two counts, the first being based upon a promissory note in the sum of $2,000 and the second being for money advanced to defendant in the sum of $1300. Defendant answered admitting all the allegations of the first count and admitting the receipt of the $1300 mentioned in the second count. However, as affirmative defense and also by way of counterclaim, he alleged services rendered by him to the plaintiff corporation for which it agreed to pay…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mercer v. . VoseNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Storms v. LemonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Benham v. RoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
  4. Arkansas Midland Railway Co. v. GriffithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1897
  5. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. PalmerNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Builders Steel Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  2. Donahue v. Ziv Television Programs, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Duma v. JanniMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Florey v. SinkeyNevada Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Ferguson v. DamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API