Legal Opinion

Florant v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 23, 2003No. 3D02-207PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

George Saint Florant appeals his convictions for armed robbery, home-invasion robbery, kidnapping, and burglary with an assault. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

The State concedes that the home invasion conviction is subsumed within the conviction for burglary with an assault. Weiss v. State, 720 So.2d 1113 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). We remand for the striking of the home-invasion robbery conviction, and for a new sentencing hearing on a recalculated guidelines scoresheet.

We find no merit to the claim of discovery error under Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla.1971). Assuming for purposes…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. Weiss v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Reynolds v. SV CENTRAL DANIA PROPERTIESDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API