Legal Opinion

Northern Pac. R. Co. v. Kranich

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Montana

Decided November 14, 1892PublishedCited by 10 opinions

At Law. Action in ejectment by the Northern Pacific Railroad Company against Ernst Kranich. On motion to strike from the answer alleged inconsistent averments. Overruled.

1Opinion of the Court

Knowles, District Judge.

Plaintiff commenced a suit against the defendant in the nature of an action of ejectment to recover the possession of certain real estate. The complaint is in the usual form, showing the ownership of plaintiff, the entry and ouster by defendant, and the retention and possession of same by him. The answer denies the ownership of plaintiff, and admits possession in defendant. The answer sets up as new matter the statute of limitation, and also facts showing that the defendant had applied to enter said land under the pre-emption laws of the United States, and the contest…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCracken v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Hayes v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  3. McManus v. O'SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Smith v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Smith v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Altschul v. O'NeillOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Boe v. ArnoldOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Abar v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API