Legal Opinion

Kelsey v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 3, 1902PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLathrop, J.

These are four actions of tort. The first two are for injuries sustained by the plaintiffs while living, and which since their death are prosecuted by their administrator. The last two are brought by their administrator to recover for their deaths. The four cases were tried together, and at the close of the evidence the presiding judge directed the jury to return a verdict for the defendant in each case; and the cases are before us on the plaintiffs’ exceptions.

The record is a long one, as it contains all the evidence introduced at the trial, but we think that the facts, so far as the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. GainesIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Favor v. Boston & Lowell RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  3. Lamb v. Old Colony RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  4. Howard v. Union Freight RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  5. Flynn v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Oulighan v. ButlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  2. Brooks v. Fitchburg & Leominster Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  3. Mumma v. Easton & Amboy RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1906
  4. Jones v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Shine v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API