People v. Anderson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s contention that County Court should have precluded the in-court identification by the eyewitness for lack of notice pursuant to CPL 710.30 (1) (b) is not preserved for our review because defendant failed to move to preclude the evidence on that ground (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Pagan, 248 AD2d 325, affd 93 NY2d 891). We decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). The further contention of defendant that the prosecutor’s failure to provide…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. GallowayNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. TongeNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. Rosa-SanchezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. CunninghamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. CrawfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. DelatorresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. EstradaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.