Legal Opinion

Union Carbide Corporation v. The Dow Chemical Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 9, 1982No. 81-2419Published

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Chief Judge:

The Union Carbide Corporation (Carbide) sued the Dow Chemical Company (Dow) for infringement of Carbide’s process patent No. 3,242,219 for making the chemical bis-phenol-A. The trial court refused to adopt Dow’s narrow construction of the ’219 patent’s claims. It also rejected Dow’s arguments concerning the patent’s obviousness and Carbide’s misrepresentations to the Patent Office. Accordingly, it found that the ’219 patent is valid, and that it has been infringed by Dow.

On appeal, Dow presses the identical arguments it urged below, couching them in terms of this court’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Marconi Wireless Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. United States v. Garrett Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Lee v. RungeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Karl Ziegler, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Phillips Petroleum Company, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API