Legal Opinion

Follansbee Steel Corp. v. United States

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 22, 1955No. Civ. A. No. 10640Published

1Opinion of the Court

WILLSON, District Judge.

This is a case in which the taxpayer should recover. I have this date filed an opinion in a case involving the same question, Sharon Steel Corporation v. United States of America, D.C., 139 F.Supp. 414, in which the decision is for the defense. However, as to this issue, the loan is clearly evidenced by a promissory note. It is a straight commercial transaction. The loan was made in the regular course of business by a regular customer of the bank and was approved by the commercial credit department of the bank and not by the Investment Committee, and was made in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Niles-Bement-Pond Co. v. FitzpatrickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  2. Curtis Publishing Co. v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Sharon Steel Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API