Legal Opinion

Washington v. Heid

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1972PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

This is an action for damages for the alleged wrongful garnishment of $73.34 of plaintiff’s wages. Defendant counterclaimed for the balance claimed to be due from plaintiff to defendant on a promissory note. The trial court entered a judgment of involuntary nonsuit to plaintiff’s cause of action upon the ground there was insufficient proof of malice, of damages, and of lack of probable cause. On a motion for a directed verdict, the trial court ruled that defend ant’s note had been paid in full. Plaintiff appealed, complaining of the nonsuit.

No question has been raised on appeal concerning the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mays v. StegemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Eagle Industries, Inc. v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Botefur v. City of Eagle PointCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  3. Botefur v. City of Eagle Point, OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. Savelich Logging Company v. Preston Mill CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Williams v. LeathamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API