Legal Opinion

State v. Rangel

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided December 29, 1993No. 920802-CAPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GREENWOOD, Judge:

Defendant Alfred Rangel appeals his conviction of forcible sexual abuse, in violation of Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-404 (1990). Defendant argues that Utah Rule of Evidence 615 is unconstitutional, facially and as applied in his case, and that the trial court abused its discretion by allowing the victim to testify after she had remained in the courtroom throughout the entire trial. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

The State originally charged defendant with one count of forcible sexual abuse and one count of attempted rape, or in the alternative, aggravated sexual assault. After a bench…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. CarterUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Wells v. Children's Aid Soc. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. CarlsonUtah Supreme Court · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Orem v. HenrieCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  2. State v. Beltran-FelixCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1996
  3. State v. GarnerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008
  4. State v. StraderCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1995
  5. State v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API