Legal Opinion

Perry v. City of Big Rapids

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1887PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error to Mecosta. (Fuller, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

Plaintiff sued to recover taxes paid under protest, for which the tax collector was proceeding to collection under his warrant.

*147The taxes were leyied in 1885. The supervisor, had assessed plaintiff for $300 upon the contents of his office, to which plaintiff did not object. When the board of review met, that body, of its own motion, and without testimony, raised the assessment to $1,800, doing so upon the claim that certain abstract books referring to land titles in Mecosta county should be taxed at that rate. After raising the assessment, plaintiff was notified of it, and appeared by counsel…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dart v. WoodhouseMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hudson Motor Car Co. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Washtenaw County v. State Tax CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Edward Rose Building Co. v. Independence TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Leon Loan & Abstract Co. v. Equalization BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  5. State Ex Rel. Dane County Title Co. v. Board of Review of City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API