Legal Opinion

State v. City of Haines City

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 16, 1939PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Buford, J.—The

appeal brings for review decree of Circuit Court validating refunding bonds.

Appellant presents six questions for our consideration as follows:

“Question No. 1: Are the bonds of the City of Haines City known as ‘Town of Haines City Seven Per Cent Street Paving Bonds’ dated July 1, 1920, refundable into unlimited tax bonds?”
“Question No. 2: Are the reversionary clauses in the proposed refunding bonds to refund the bonds of the City of Haines City known as ‘Town of Haines City Seven Per Cent Street Paving Bonds’ dated July 1, 1920, valid in that if such reversion takes place the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Charlotte Harbor & Northern Railway Co. v. WellesSupreme Court of Florida · 1919
  2. Harrell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  3. State v. City of PensacolaSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  4. State v. City of SanfordSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  5. Bay County v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sullivan v. Volusia County Canvassing Bd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API