State v. McPherson
Oregon Supreme Court
.From Crook: William L. Bradshaw, Judge. The defendant, John M. McPherson, was indicted with Judd McPherson and Mace Newsham for larceny, and having demanded separate trials, upon conviction, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court 1
Department 1.
2Opinion of the Court · BurnettJustice Burnett
1. The defendant was indicted with others for the larceny of a mare. The cause having been brought to issue on a separate trial of the defendant, he moved for a continuance of the case on the ground of the ab*373senee of witnesses, but the court overruled the same. These matters are in the discretion of the court, and in the absence from the bill of exceptions of the affidavits, if any, in support of the motion, and showing the substance of the testimony that would have been given by the absent witnesses, we cannot say that the court has abused its discretion.
2, 3. The defendant was…
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. ReyesOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- State v. ButchekOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- State v. LaytonOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- State v. StevensonOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- State v. Wong Wen TeungOregon Supreme Court · 1921
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.