Legal Opinion

Ferrigno v. Yoder

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 10, 1986No. 86-1400PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Judge.

Mr. and Mrs. Ferrigno, the plaintiffs in the underlying personal injury and declaratory judgment actions, have petitioned this court for certiorari to review the trial court’s protective order barring each from attending the deposition of the other. We grant certiorari and quash the order entered below.

In response to the Ferrignos’ petition for certiorari, respondents Suncoast Insurers, Inc., and Ted Bogusz stated that the core issue in the declaratory judgment action centers upon whether Bogusz, a business associate and close personal friend of the Ferrignos, provided the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ronald E. Galella v. Jacqueline Onassis, John Walsh, and United States of America, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  2. Wilson v. ClarkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Spaeth v. WarNer Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941
  4. LINGELBACH'S BAVARIAN v. Del BelloDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Dardashti v. SingerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Goldman v. State Farm Fire Gen. Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Onaka v. OnakaHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  3. O'Brien v. Florida Birth-Related Neuro.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  4. Saewitz v. SaewitzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  5. Smith v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API