Goldstein v. City of Long Beach
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Ughetta, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur. Christ, J., dissents and votes to affirm the order, with' the following memorandum, in which Beldoek, P. J., concurs. The majority memorandum frames the issue and provides us with the salient facts; it is the analysis and result of the majority with which I disagree. Section 256-a of the Charter of the City of Long Beach should not be judicially interpreted so as to expand its applicability beyond its clear wording. Prior notice of an “out of repair, unsafe, dangerous or obstructed, * * * street, highway, bridge, culvert, sidewalk, crosswalk,…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Ferris v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Auburn Police Local 195 v. HelsbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Stratton v. City of BeaconAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Englehardt v. Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Erie County v. WhalenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.