Legal Opinion

Antgoulatos v. Honduran S.S. Norlandia

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided March 23, 1956No. 3573PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMSEN, Chief Judge.

This case is before the court on libellants’ motion to require that the sworn statement filed in reply to libellants’ request for admission of facts and/or of genuineness of documents, pursuant to Admiralty Rule 32B, 28 U.S.C.A.,1 be made by an agent of the corporate respondent who has knowledge of the facts.

The request for admissions was directed to the respondents, plural, whereas only one respondent has been served with process or appeared, namely, Silet Cia De Vapores, S.A., a foreign corporation with its principal office in Panama, represented by Maritime Agencies,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lackey v. Mesa Petroleum Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Jones v. GoldsteinDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1966
  3. Hensley v. Fairview Park HospitalCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1970
  4. Lackey v. Mesa Petroleum Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API