Legal Opinion

Claim of Smith v. Certain Teed Products Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 17, 1981PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed December 19,1980, which ruled that the claims were barred by the provisions of section 40 of the Workers’ Compensation Law. Claimant’s deceased was exposed to asbestos dust while employed by Certain Teed Products Corporation between July 1, 1966 and June 1,1972. He became disabled on January 18,1975, learned that he was suffering from the work-related disease of mesothelioma in December of 1975, and died from that disease on February 15, 1976. The deceased’s disability claim and claimant’s death claim were ultimately disallowed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Claim of Nick v. William J. Meyer Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  2. Claim of Roberts v. Agway, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. AerospaceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Fama v. P & M SorbaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Claim of Grill v. Fashion Institute of TechnologyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Claim of Valenti v. Penn Plax PlasticsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API