Legal Opinion

Cardozo v. Bloomingdale

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided March 15, 1913PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York entered in his favor upon a verdict directed by the court, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtBijur, J.

Plaintiff recovered from defendant for damages to plaintiff’s automobile arising out of a collision with defendant’s automobile. Defendant’s liability was conceded, the question involved in this appeal being; the extent of the damage which plaintiff might recover. The amount included in'the verdict, as directed, covers merely the cost of repairs. Evidence offered by the plaintiff to prove the “ usable value ” of the car during the time that it was being repaired, i. e., his reasonable expenditure to replace it by hiring another car during that.period, was excluded and plaintiff excepted. Both…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wellman v. MinerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1897
  2. Bondy v. New York City Railway Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1907

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pittari v. Madison Avenue Coach Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1947
  2. Sellari v. Palermo, New York County Courts1947
  3. Central Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Bonded Freightways, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Bridge v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API