Standard Development Co. v. Broz
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtNeal, J.
The appellant, plaintiff below, instituted this action by filing a complaint in two paragraphs, the first on the theory of conversion, the second, on trespass. The appellees, defendants, answered by a general denial and an affirmative answer. The court found the facts specially and stated a conclusion of law favorable to appellees. The error assigned arises on the exception to the conclusion of law.
The special finding discloses the following facts: That the appellant, a corporation, on April 12,1929, was the owner of certain personal property described in the complaint of the value of $160;…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Earle v. EarleIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- New Albany & Salem Railroad v. GroomsIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
- Proctor v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
- Hartford Fire Insurance Co. of Hartford v. ApplebaumIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919