Legal Opinion

Connecticut Mutual Life Ins. v. Stinson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 30, 1900Published

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Murray F. Tuley, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1899.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shepard

The original decree of foreclosure in this case was before this court, upon appeal by the present appellant, who was complainant below, as reported in 62 Ill. App. 319, and the order of this court reversing that decree with-directions was affirmed by the Supreme Court. (174 Ill. 125.)

By such order of reversal the Circuit Court was directed to increase and add to the amount found due to the appellant, certain sums paid by appellant in the matter of tax sales of the mortgaged premises.

The present appellee, Stinson, the maker of the mortgage, and defendant, was apparently satisfied to pay…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stinson v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Jenks v. BurrIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Pulsifer v. ShepardIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Connecticut Mutual Life Ins. v. StinsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API