Legal Opinion

City of St. Matthews v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 26, 1954PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNCAN, Justice.

This original action seeks a special writ of mandamus to require respondent, Judge of the Jefferson Circuit Court, Chancery Branch, First Division, to set aside his order abating two remonstrance actions pending before him styled F. S. Goodrich, et al. v. City of St. Matthews, and J. Clay Murphey, Jr. v. City of St. Matthews.

The two actions which were abated are suits filed under the provisions of Chapter 81 of the Kentucky Revised Statutes, protesting the annexation of certain territory proposed to be annexed by the City of St. Matthews, a city of the sixth class. The City of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Riordan v. RiordanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952
  2. Engle v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1953

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. O'Bannon v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Merrick v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1961
  3. Glasson v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1972
  4. Curtis v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1960
  5. Riddle v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API