United States v. Ronald Joseph Kurka, United States of America v. David Lee Combs
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUG, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Combs was convicted, under criminal statute 18 U.S.C. § 33 (1982), of having damaged, with reckless disregard for the safety of human life, a motor vehicle in interstate commerce. Appellant Kurka was convicted, under 18 U.S.C. § 2 (1982), of having aided and abetted Combs in violating 18 U.S.C. § 33. The dispositive issue presented on appeal is whether “willful” damage to motor vehicles is an essential element of the crime proscribed by 18 U.S.C. § 33. The indictment did not charge that the damage to the vehicle had been done willfully, and the instructions to the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lee v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. J. Murray Hooker, IICourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Du BoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- State v. WellsHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- United States v. Shane Arthur JamesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. William Howard NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.