Legal Opinion
Spicehandler v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 10, 1951PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*756There is no evidence that appellant created a condition on the sidewalk dangerous to pedestrians. The most the evidence shows is that appellant, although removing snow and ice from the sidewalk on several occasions following storms, in the period between the blizzard of December 26, 1947, and the date of the accident, February 7, 1948, failed to remove all snow and ice. (Zysk v. City of New York, 300 N. Y. 507; Hendley v. Daw Drug Co., 293 N. Y. 790.) Johnston, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hendley v. Daw Drug Company, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Zysk v. City of New York, RollNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
3Cited by9 opinions
- Zwielich v. Incorporated Village of FreeportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Gentile v. Rotterdam SquareAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Joseph v. Pitkin Carpet, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Albanese v. Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Glassman v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.