Federal Motor Truck Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtWhaley, Judge
This case is brought for the purpose of having a final settlement contract reopened and reformed on the ground of mutual mistake when it was executed. The material facts are not disputed.
The plaintiff, in August, 1918, entered into a contract with the defendant to manufacture a thousand artillery tractors-at a certain fixed price. When the armistice was signed the plaintiff had not completed the manufacture and delivery of all of the tractors. The delivery of more tractors would exceed the peace requirements of the defendant and it was-decided to be in the financial interest of the Government…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. William Cramp & Sons Ship & Engine Building Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- United States v. Milliken Imprinting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Ackerlind v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Hygienic Fibre Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1924
- Chicago, Wilmington & Franklin Coal Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.