O'Neill v. City of Birmingham
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
B017LDIN, J.
Appellants, John W. O’Neill and Lizzie M. O’Neill, sued the city of Birmingham and Southern Railway Company for consequential damages for alleged injuries to abutting property by the construction of a viaduct on Twenty-Fourth street in Birmingham.
Plea No. 4, set out in the report of the ease, was sustained as against demurrer. This ruling- is here presented for review.
Mere silent acquiescence in the taking of property for public use by those having the right of eminent domain, or such acquiescence in improvements resulting in consequential injury to abutting property for which…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Scharfenburg v. Town of New DecaturSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Andrews v. FriersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
- Alabama Central Railroad v. MusgroveSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Thornton v. Sheffield & Birmingham R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1887
- Groetter, Weil & Co. v. Norman Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1894
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Blount County v. McPhersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- Pickens County v. JordanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Stone v. EcholsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Farmers & Ginners Cotton Oil v. Reliance Ins.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Alabama Power Co. v. HensonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.