Legal Opinion

Leonhart v. McCormick

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 27, 1975No. Civ. A. 75-28, EriePublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WEBER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs seek a head-on collision between the provisions of the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Code, Article XIV, Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility Provisions, Act of 1959, April 29, P.L. 58 §§ 1413 and 1414 [75 P.S. §§ 1413, 1414] and the Due Process and Equal Protection clauses of the Constitution of the United States. On the road thereto they also sideswipe Article V, The Judiciary, of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, P.S., insofar as it vests judicial power in minor magistrates or justices of the peace.

Plaintiffs, both of whom had been…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. North Carolina v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Rocky Mountain Helicopters, Inc. v. Air Freight, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Cianos v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  3. Wooldridge v. Beech Aircraft Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1979
  4. Lighting Horizons, Inc. v. E. A. Kahn & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. Simon v. WardDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API