Legal Opinion

Charles Farrell v. Howard Peters, George Wilson, and Jane Higgins

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 3, 1992No. 89-1859PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff, an Illinois state prisoner, brought this civil rights suit against prison officials who forbade him to correspond v/ith his “common law” wife, an inmate of another Illinois prison, in reliance on a rule of the Illinois Department of Corrections that — the plaintiff argues — violates the First Amendment. The rule provides that “permission for committed persons to correspond between intra-state and inter-state correctional facilities shall require the approval of the Chief Administrative Officers of both facilities and shall be based on safety and security concerns.”…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. United States v. Thomas E. Silverstein, Adolph Reynosa, Clayton A. Fountain, and Edgar HevleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  3. Randy Karl Gometz v. Gary L. Henman, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Marion, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  4. Peirce v. PeirceIllinois Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JessupMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  2. Pippins v. Adams County JailDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1994
  3. Howard v. KeohaneDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1995
  4. Rambo v. DaleyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API