Legal Opinion
Friedman v. Tappan Development Corp.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 17, 1956PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
39 N.J. Super. 103 (1956)
120 A.2d 633
EDWARD FRIEDMAN AND GUS ZACKARAKIS, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
TAPPAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, A NEW YORK CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued February 6, 1956.
Decided February 17, 1956.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.
Mr. Herman L. Fast argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Messrs. Fast & Fast, attorneys).
Mr. Joseph M. Rotolo argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents (Messrs. Rotolo & Rotolo, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, J.A.D.
This is an appeal from a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Porter v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Allegheny College v. National Chautauqua County Bank of JamestownNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Maryland Realty Co. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- American Handkerchief Corp. v. Frannat Realty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Bancroft v. MartinMississippi Supreme Court · 1926
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wellmore Builders, Inc. v. WannierNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- State v. Bakers Basin Realty Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975