Legal Opinion

Sherwood v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 3, 1959No. 58-285Published

1Opinion

On Petition for Rehearing

2Per curiam

The petition for rehearing filed on behalf of the appellant is hereby stricken because it is in substantial violation of material provisions of Florida Appellate Rule 3.14, 31 F.S.A., relating to such petitions.

Subparagraph “d” of rule 3.14 states that ■“in case of a substantial violation of any material provision of this rule, the petition [for rehearing] will be stricken by the Court on its own motion and the contents will not be considered.” Subparagraph “b” of the cited rule, dealing with contents of a petition for rehearing, provides: “The petition for rehearing…

3Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. City of LakelandSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. Wiltcher v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1910
  3. State Ex Rel. Jaytex Realty Co. v. GreenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  4. First National Bank v. AshmeadSupreme Court of Florida · 1887
  5. Payne v. IveySupreme Court of Florida · 1922

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API