Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Coleman's executors

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 19, 1813PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINlOMoi the court, by

Ch J. Boyle.

This was an act!on of assumpsit, to which the defendant pleaded ; 1st, the general issue ; 2d, the statute of limitations ; and 3d, a setoff. Upon the 1st and 2d pleas, issues w^re regularly joined ; to the 3d, there were several distinct replications, upon which issues in fact were joined to the country.

Upon all the issues thus made up, there was a general verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, to which this writ of error with supersedeas is prosecuted by the defendant.

The errors relied on for the reversal of the judgment, grow exclusively out of the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bennett v. McCrocklinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1860

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API