Legal Opinion
People v. Gray
Criminal Court of the City of New York
Decided March 14, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*853OPINION OF THE COURT
Laura Safer-Espinoza, J.
Each of the defendants in this case is charged with disorderly conduct (Penal Law § 240.20 [5], [6]). These charges are a result of their participation in a demonstration organized by Transportation Alternatives on October 22, 1990, at the entrance to the south outer roadway of the Queensboro Bridge, in opposition to the opening to vehicular traffic of the one lane that had been reserved for bicycles and pedestrians, during evening rush hours.
Pursuant to an agreement with the Manhattan District Attorney’s office, defendants stipulated to the facts…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- People v. GoetzNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. PadgettNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. TorreNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. Newman, New York County Courts2004
- People v. Cromwell (James)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2019
- State of Washington v. Spokane County Dist. CourtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020