Daniel Construction Company v. Pierce
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
GOODWYN, Justice.
Appellant, Daniel Construction Company, was a general contractor building a steam power plant at Gantt, Alabama. Royce F. Pierce, a minor, 17 years of age, the son of appellee, L. C. Pierce, was employed by a subcontractor doing the brick and tile work on the job. Both the subcontractor and Royce were subject to the provisions of the Alabama Workmen’s Compensation Act (Code 1940, Tit. 26, § 253 et seq., as amended). Royce, while rolling a wheelbarrow loaded with mortar along a scaffolding, fell to a brick wall and then to a concrete floor, thereby causing injuries resulting…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Robert E. McKee, General Contractor v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 1954
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. MillonasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Housing Authority v. Decatur Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1953
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Kilcrease v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- Johnson Publishing Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Hill v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Blount Brothers Construction Company v. RoseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
- Oden v. Pepsi Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.