Legal Opinion

Daniel Construction Company v. Pierce

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 29, 1959No. 4 Div. 869PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODWYN, Justice.

Appellant, Daniel Construction Company, was a general contractor building a steam power plant at Gantt, Alabama. Royce F. Pierce, a minor, 17 years of age, the son of appellee, L. C. Pierce, was employed by a subcontractor doing the brick and tile work on the job. Both the subcontractor and Royce were subject to the provisions of the Alabama Workmen’s Compensation Act (Code 1940, Tit. 26, § 253 et seq., as amended). Royce, while rolling a wheelbarrow loaded with mortar along a scaffolding, fell to a brick wall and then to a concrete floor, thereby causing injuries resulting…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Robert E. McKee, General Contractor v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. MillonasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  5. Housing Authority v. Decatur Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1953

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Kilcrease v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  2. Johnson Publishing Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  3. Hill v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. Blount Brothers Construction Company v. RoseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  5. Oden v. Pepsi Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API