Radcliff v. Clemons
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
HAMBLEN, Chief Justice.
This is the second appeal of this case-to come before this Court. On this appeal none of the litigants has favored this Court with a statement of the facts giving rise to the litigation. The following, which we find to be supported by the evidence, is. taken from the findings of fact made by the-trial court, and from the opinion of this. Court on the former appeal.
Jack Lyles, a used-car dealer in Houston,, some time prior to August 2, 1948, had floor-planned a 1946 Plymouth with Security Discount Corporation, and as a part of the transaction had turned over to- that…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hudspeth v. HudspethCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
3Cited by8 opinions
- Houston Belt & Terminal Railway Co. v. J. Weingarten, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Rodriguez v. YenawineCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Board of Firemen's Relief & Retirement Fund Trustees of Harris County v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
- Clovis Finance Company v. SidesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Payne v. LaughlinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.