Legal Opinion

Keith Fulton & Sons, Inc. v. Continental Insurance

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided September 27, 1967No. Civ. A. No. 65-349-GPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND INTERLOCUTORY ORDER

GARRITY, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Keith Fulton & Sons, Inc. (“Fulton”), a trucking company, has sued the defendant, Continental Insurance Company of the City of New York (“Continental”), on a liability insurance policy issued by the defendant. The plaintiff allegedly became liable to one of its customers, Bethlehem Steel Corp. (“Bethlehem”), when part of a lathe belonging to Bethlehem fell from the plaintiff’s truck and was damaged. Jurisdiction of this court has been invoked on the basis of diversity of citizenship, which has been established. At a pretrial…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. Of North America v. Newtowne Mfg. Co. Insurance Co. Of North America v. Holland Transp. Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1951
  2. Northwestern Marble & Tile Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  3. Bell v. American Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  4. McCarthy v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  5. Mendelsohn v. Automobile InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vandivort Construction Co. v. Seattle Tennis ClubCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  2. Colonial Gas Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1993
  3. Walton Hauling & Warehouse Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API