Legal Opinion

Konover v. Hochman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 26, 1983No. 82-1376PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LETTS, Judge.

The question presented is whether the jury correctly calculated a money verdict in favor of a new home buyer and against the seller builder. We conclude its calculations were incorrect. ■

As we view it, extensive treatment of this case will add nothing to the body of the law and we write sparingly only to explain our conclusion.

The warranty furnished by the seller specifically excluded driveways, walkways, patios and swimming pools. Yet the ver-diet included $2,000 to correct a pool system defect and $810 for the driveway. Both these amounts must be deducted.

The repair to the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tillman v. HowellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Portela Investments, Inc. v. PiedraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API