Legal Opinion

Francis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 7, 1991No. 90-1693PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Albert Francis appeals from judgments of conviction for two counts of aggravated assault with a firearm. During voir dire examination of prospective jurors, the trial court denied defense counsel an opportunity to question jurors individually. Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.300(b) permits “[t]he court [to] examine each prospective juror individually or [to] examine the prospective jurors collectively.” However, the rule also states that “[t]he right of the parties to conduct an examination of each juror orally shall be preserved.” In Gosha v. State, 534 So.2d 912 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988),…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gosha v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. Pineda v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  2. Fleckinger v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. Honorat v. GenovaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API