Legal Opinion
Azurite Corp. v. Amster & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 5, 1995No. Nos. 263, 391, Dockets 94-7197, 94-7235PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUMBARD, Circuit Judge:
On February 1, 1989, Azurite Corp. Ltd. brought an action in the Southern District under section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), to recover damages from the defendants, Am-ster & Co., then known as Lafer, Amster & Co. (“LACO”), and its partners Arnold Marvin Amster, Barry Stuart Lafer, and Joel Richard Packer. Azurite claimed that the defendants made false disclosures and omissions in their Schedule 13D amendments filed under section 13(d) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78m(d), thereby causing Azurite and other investors to sell…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Austin v. Ford Models, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Electronics Communications Corp. v. Toshiba America Consumer Products, Inc. And Audiovox CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Yerdon v. HenryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Yerdon v. HenryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Azurite Corp. Ltd. v. Amster & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.