Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Wilson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 5, 1921No. Appeal, No. 342PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal, No. 342, Oct. T., 1920, by defendant, from judgment of Q. S. Lycoming County, Sept. Sessions, 1918, No. 47, on verdict of guilty in the case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Frank I. Wilson. Indictment for larceny by bailee. Before Whitehead, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Verdict of guilty on which judgment of sentence was passed. Defendant appealed. Error assigned, among others, was the charge of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Orlady, P. J.,

The defendant was convicted under an indictment charging him with larceny and larceny as bailee. The facts developed on the trial were substantially as follows : On May 22, 1918, Mrs. Begbie pledged with him as a licensed pawnbroker, a diamond necklace valued at $2,400, to secure a loan of $50; on June 5, 1918, another loan of $50 was secured, and a diamond and emerald brooch and sapphire ring were pledged, the former of the value of $400, and the ring at $175; on June 19, 1918, a third loan of $10 was secured, and a cluster diamond ring valued at $90 was pledged; on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RussoguloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  2. Commonwealth v. KaiserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  3. Commonwealth v. WassonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  4. Katzenberg v. OberndorfSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EakinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Commonwealth v. BuckDelaware County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API