Curd v. Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC
Supreme Court of Florida
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partPolston, J.
I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part. Although I use different reason*1229ing, I agree with the majority’s affirmative answer to the certified question of whether commercial fishermen can recover damages for their loss of income pursuant to section 376.313, Florida Statutes (2004). However, I disagree with the majority’s affirmative answer to the certified question of whether, under the facts of the case, commercial fishermen can recover economic losses proximately caused by the negligent release of pollution under Florida common law.
As an initial matter, I note that the majority…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- McCain v. Florida Power CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- RK Constructors, Inc. v. Fusco Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Hamilton v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2001
- City of Chicago v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.