Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Baxter

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 25, 1994No. 69 E.D. Appeal Docket 1992PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CAPPY, ■ Justice.

In this appeal, the Appellant contends that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance for failing to investigate the background of the Commonwealth’s primary witness. Appellant asserts that an investigation would have disclosed that the witness was incarcerated at the time that the Appellant allegedly confessed to him, directly contradicting the witness’s testimony that he was at the Appellant’s home when the Appellant confessed. We agree that counsel was ineffective and, accordingly, reverse the Order of the Superior Court and remand for a new trial.

On…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Commonwealth v. MabieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. AbneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KimballSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. SmallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Commonwealth v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Commonwealth v. CascardoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API