McPhail v. City of Denver
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to Denver County Court. Hon. H. S. Class, Judge. Decision en banc on rehearing.
1Opinion of the CourtTeller, J.
The plaintiff in error was convicted of violating section 750 of article 2, chapter 16 of the Municipal Code of *249the City and County of Denver, which requires owners of dogs to pay to the city treasurer, annually, a prescribed sum for each dog so owned or kept in said city. He alleges error-in the proceedings and seeks to reverse the judgment imposing a fine upon him.
Section 747 of the said Municipal Code reads in part as follows: ‘ “It shall be the duty of said dog license inspector to ascertain whether or not proper license has been paid for any dog, as provided by ordinance. In the event…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sentell v. New Orleans & Carrollton R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- State ex. rel. Curtis v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
- Minard v. Douglas CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1881
- Pearson v. LovejoyNew York Supreme Court · 1866
- Cole v. HallIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Thiele v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
- Johsel Namkung v. John P. Boyd, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization at the Port of Seattle, State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Town of Nutley v. ForneyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971