Bernstein v. Heinemann
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by the defendants from a ijudgment of the' Municipal Court of the City of Mew York, borough of Manhattan, fourth district, rendered in favor of the plaintiff, by the justice thereof, without a jury, ....... ¡ The nature of the action and the material facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.
This action was brought to recover the sum of $65, for one month’s rent alleged to be due from the defendants on the 1st day of September, 1897, under a written lease bearing date April 21, 1895, of “the rooms in the front house over, the store known as Mo. 130 Forsyth'street in thé city, county and state of Mew York,” made and executed by the plaintiff, to the defendant *465Ernestine Heinemann for the term of one year from May 1, 1895, at the yearly rent or sum of $900, payable monthly in advance on the first day of each month, and written renewals thereof, as hereafter mentioned.
The sum of $7 5…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Reich v. . CochranNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Scott v. . MontellsNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Boehm v. RichNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1885
- Grafton v. BrighamNew York Supreme Court · 1893
- Schumacher v. WaringNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hecht v. Acme Coal Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1911
- McNulty v. DuffyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
- United States v. Comet Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
- Carley v. Liberty Hat Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
- Earlington Realty Corp. v. NeschisCity of New York Municipal Court · 1925